Although I use it all the time in collections of my own classes (if this isn't what you mean by getting my own classes to respond to it, feel free to elaborate). :P Seriously, I don't remember ever noticing that in one of your posts, and I've never used it before. Well, I'm sure that's probably true, George.Īs for you, strongm, I always pay attention, I'm just absent-minded. In any case, I'm pretty sure that that the performance hit is because we're accessing the heap instead of the stack, though.īob RE: using Lbound and ubound in for loop strongm (MIS) 10 Aug 05 20:23 Maybe you have to use a variant because you have to contain not only the offset and value of any given array element but also a pointer to where the object resides. It would also seem that something horribly messy and interesting is going on behind the scenes, probably involving some type of object getting created on the heap and mimicking the array. It would seem that for each should be used to iterate through object collections, the use for which it's intended. I tried it in George's program, and yes, it is a whole lot slower. In general, the using bounds is slightly faster than the setting to variables first, which bears out the idea that they get calcualated first.Īs for using for each with arrays, I never even knew you could do that.

I tried George's program, and then compiled it and tried that too.

For loop visual basic